By Luke Broadwater
lbroadwater@patuxent.com
Very logical and predictable that concerned parents would visit the emergency room when their doctor tells them that the only people being tested are in the hospital. The county health department made a bad decision in this case, directing physicians not to test for swine flu. Assumptions are being made and parents are rightly concerned about their children's health, as they should be.
Posted 6:49 AM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
But it doesn't really matter if one has H1N1 or the regular flu. It's going to suck either way. Don't crowd the hospital or call 911, you will survive.
Posted 8:13 AM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
It's is short-sighted to ignore the type of flu. When vaccinations arrive, all children are being advised to vaccinate, though many do not need it. That is irresponsible and risky for financial reasons, for health reasons, and vaccine scarcity. Compounding the error in not testing is that no one really knows what is happening with H1N1 or seasonal flu, so our data is unverifiable at best. As long as no one is testing, no epidemiological statements can be assumed accurate.
Posted 8:24 AM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
I'm with asdfgh. Since there's no real treatment for either the seasonal flu and H1N1, if you don't have any major lung/heart/immunology problems then the docs are going to tell you the same thing: it's best to stay at home and ride it out. The ER has a finite number of staff, a finite number of resources and from reading this article... it sounds like it's already over capacity. Taking up valuable staff and lab time when the clinical outcome is basically the same isn't a great idea. While it certainly would be great to have more data on the disease, and while parents naturally want as much information as they can get - the primary concern needs to be to keeping people safe. And part of that can be accomplished by making sure that our hospital isn't crippled by getting a flood of patients that shouldn't actually be seen there.
Posted 2:07 PM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
I'm with asdfgh. Since there's no real treatment for either the seasonal flu and H1N1, if you don't have any major lung/heart/immunology problems then the docs are going to tell you the same thing: it's best to stay at home and ride it out. The ER has a finite number of staff, a finite number of resources and from reading this article... it sounds like it's already over capacity. Taking up valuable staff and lab time when the clinical outcome is basically the same isn't a great idea. While it certainly would be great to have more data on the disease, and while parents naturally want as much information as they can get - the primary concern needs to be to keeping people safe. And part of that can be accomplished by making sure that our hospital isn't crippled by getting a flood of patients that shouldn't actually be seen there.
Posted 2:07 PM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
Individual choice is optimal, but we're not allowed to be tested if we individually discern for health reasons that we need the test. In terms of what is good for all, we need the accurate data: http://www.baltimoresun.com/features/health/sns-ap-us-med-counting-swine-flu,0,4225829.story
Posted 2:36 PM, 10.09.09 | Permalink
My own 12 year old missed the whole week of school last week because she has been sick with the flu. I DID NOT,however,rush her to the emergency room as so many people told me I should. I took care of her at home,and you know what? She is 100% better now,on her own,without being tested or having antibiotics. People who rush to the emergency room are only putting themselves and everyone else at risk by spreading the germs around. I'm with asdfgh on this too,that if you aren't having a serious emergency that stems from the flu,then keep your child at home!
Posted 6:28 AM, 10.12.09 | Permalink
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement