By Sarah Breitenbach
sbreitenbach@patuxent.com
(Enlarge) The Glenwood Community Center, in Cookesville, will be charging a $25 annual fee. (Staff photo by Drew Anthony Smith)
County Official Goes Back on Word would be a better title for this article. Our officials, both appointed and elected have nearly all failed us. It's time to clean house, voters.
Posted 6:57 AM, 01.12.10 | Permalink
Seriously? People are complaining about paying a $25 annual fee? That's $2 a month! Isn't it worth $2 a month to have a brand new community center to use whenever you want, than to have nothing at all? They'd be paying a lot more than that if CA were their only option. I think it's great that Rec & Parks is providing an reasonable alternative to expensive gyms.
Posted 12:05 PM, 01.12.10 | Permalink
And sheila dixon should be re-elected forever because she only took a few bucks from the destitute people in her city, right strawberry? People need to do what they say they're going to do. Without that, we'll have to unseat every incumbent this year and get some better people appointed to these positions where you can sell citizens one bill of goods and charge them something unilaterally determined outside of a contract.
Posted 12:39 PM, 01.12.10 | Permalink
Is this what Civility in Howard County is all about? It's "civil" because it is only a few bucks they are cheating us out of? Where is the line of morality drawn... $25, $100, $1,000? What are we teaching our kids about "when the going gets tough" go back on your word, cheat and steal to get ahead?
Posted 2:13 PM, 01.12.10 | Permalink
I'm one of the residents quoted in the article. Important point of clarification: The county is now charging $25 a year *per person* to use the center - not $25 for our entire family, as the article incorrectly states. Another point not made clear in the story: the community center's staff more than once during the registration process, enthusiastically promoted the membership as a "lifetime" membership, using that word specifically. Also, the claim that the computer system required an "arbitrary" expiration date to print a receipt simply doesn't hold water. Why would a program be designed to accept and process an expiration date (labeled as such on the printed membership agreement/receipt) and then accept only an arbitrary date (and one 92 years in the future, at that)? More plausible is that the program couldn't accept alphanumeric characters, such as would be needed to indicate "lifetime," and, as an alternative, center workers punched in the most distant numeric date the computer would accept, reasoning that few if any county residents would live to see 2099 (effectively making it a "lifetime" agreement). Most important, I want to make clear that we don't dispute the county's right to change its fee policy for new memberships. We're simply asking that the county honor its original agreement with us and other families who signed up under the original offer.
Posted 7:58 AM, 01.14.10 | Permalink
strawberryfields: I realize this might sound like we're arguing about chump change here. But as I said in my previous post, the new fee is $25 a person, so $100 annually for my family of four. Still, that sounds like a bargain, right? Problem is, all that covers is access to the gymnasium (hoops and walking track) and a small game room. If you want a "fitness pass" to use the workout room/equipment, that's an additional fee - $263 a year for 100 visits for residents. Also, the center charges rental fees for its community rooms and additional fees for other activities, such as weight training. The point is the new annual fee doesn't get you full use of the facility. If I wanted to join a fee-based gym, I would have done that in the private sector. I don't expect to pay hefty annual fees for a taxpayer-funded facility that you and I paid to build, and continue to fund through county taxes. Interesting to note that across the parking lot from the community center is the Glenwood branch library - a beautiful facility that offers my family more benefits onsite and online than the community center (and that I suspect has a much higher operating cost) and there's no fee - other than my taxes - required to use it. Should we start charging for that, too?
Posted 1:24 PM, 01.14.10 | Permalink
Get a life, central Marylanders. Outside the Baltimore-Washington "bubble", we've got 12%+ unemployment. There are no crowds at the local mall, people can't get jobs. Pay your darn fees and be grateful for your government (or government contract) jobs.
Posted 10:56 PM, 01.14.10 | Permalink
My family doesn't even use the facility. I went through their mandatory fitness room overview, only to be told at the end that it would cost $263 for 100 days, or over $800 per year to use a relatively bush-league array of equipment. I bought an exercise bike.
Posted 6:22 AM, 01.15.10 | Permalink
Mr. Graziano is correct - they are asking $25 per person per year ($100 for my family of four) and this only gives you access to the basketball court and walking track, not the fitness center. The memberships were in fact advertised as lifetime and as part of an ongoing Howard County wellness campaign. This center is also a safe, afterschool option for local middle school students. These types of services are already paid for by tax dollars.
Posted 7:32 AM, 01.15.10 | Permalink
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement