In response to the letter from former board members and others in the July 24 Flier concerning Kimco Realty's Wilde Lake Village Center revitalization plan, we disagree with several points.

They state that there is no resident consensus on the proposed project. If there is no consensus, why then should we proceed with Kimco's proposals? Based on meetings, discussions, and a resident petition, we believe that there is significant opposition to the proposal for extensive residential units in the village center.

Further, the writers argue that there are many, if not more, residents who recognize that a grocery store is not viable in the village center. Apparently, the writers base their view on Kimco's assertion that none of the grocery outlets it contacted would come to Wilde Lake. We believe that a grocery store is essential, whether or not new residential units are built. And it seems to us that with all of the talented people and the resources in Columbia, we can create a tailor-made grocery store.

In pointing out that Giant and Safeway stores exist in other village centers and that the basic food needs of residents can be met by shopping in other centers, the writers are dismissive of the needs of those who cannot, should not or prefer not to drive. Furthermore, David's Natural Market is not an alternative for many Wilde Lake residents who may not be able to afford its products, and it cannot stock a range of staples.

We feel that Kimco's proposal is too skewed toward residential use. Without proper mixed use, residents will be forced to travel outside Wilde Lake for goods and services.

If, as the writers state, the original village concept cannot be sustained in the current economic environment, how can Kimco's proposal be sustained in the uncertain economic environment we now face?

Elaine Andrews

Joyce Baer

Wilde Lake

user comments (0)